J.B. Religion Essay -- essays papers

J.B. Religion At the end of Baldwins 1952 novel Go Tell It on the Mountain, John Grimes, the young protagonist, has an epiphany or what is more commonly referred to as a visionary conversion experience, a staple of American religious life. He embraces Jesus and endures a state of rapturous mysticism in which he experiences his drifting soul ... anchored in the love of God (204). Johns rebirth in Christ, his being saved, is an affirmation of one of the strongest bulwarks in the African American lodge during slavery, and especially since its abolition the black church. (2) Baldwin has said that everything in Black history comes out of the church. It is not a redemptive force that a bridge across troubled water, Kalamu ya Salaam interviewing Baldwin responded. It is how we forged our identity (Pratt and Stanley 182). The church is the African Americans inheritance. Black writers and the characters they create are not so good divested of it, nor should they be. Though John Grimes s commitment to Christ is representative of black assimilation into American (white) culture, this adoption of Christian beliefs not only helped the community forge a stronger connection to their country and society, but it overly enabled slaves and then emancipated Africans to shore up their sense of self-worth and value. African American literature, according to Abena P. A. Busia, has therefore become a drive for self-definition and redefinition, and any discussion of this drive must recognize this, its proper context We are speaking from a state of siege (2). John Grimess trip over the course of Go Tell It on the Mountain mirrors this movement from imprisonment to freedom, from a vague sense of self to a greater consciousn... ... dilemma of his protagonist, but also exposing the moral raiseations of the institutional pillars in the black community (Bell 224). While criticism of the churchs role in supporting subtle racism is justified, it is also true that John cleverly util izes the rich resources of the church that were available to him. Would he be better off following Roy into the streets? Or Royal, Gabriels first son, who also found his way into the streets and the reendured a violent death? John wanted to be with these boys in the street, heedless and thoughtless, wearing out his treacherous and bewildering body (30). He recognizes, however, steady in the semi-transparent consciousness of a man-child, that he is being forced to make so cruel a choice (40) between the ways of the world, which in his community can too often lead to violence and self-destruction, and the ways of God.

Is Spreading Democracy in the U.S. National Interest? Essay -- U.S. Go

The Truman Doctrine established a form _or_ system of establishment of containment against communist governments. volume believed the spread of communism would overthrow the democratic ideals our country believed in and followed. After the policy of containment died down, a new policy of spreading state emerged. This new policy has both good and ill effects on the helped nations and our own. In 2011, there were 115 electoral democracies, representing nearly sixty percent of the worlds government were democratic. In 1989, just 41 percent of all governments were democratic (Current Issues, 2011-12, p. 168). So, is spreading majority rule in the U.S. national interest? Or should our nation employ a more hands-off approach?The textbook defines republic as a system of government in which the people rule rule by the many. A core belief of Democracy is that ordinary people want to rule and are capable of governing themselves (Greenberg & Page, 2011, p.4). The textbook states that polit ical thinkers attribute several components of democracy to its widespread appeal. First, democracy is considered to protect human rights the best because it is founded on the recognition of the intrinsic worth and equality of human beings. Second, democracies are the most likely to take on rational policies because it can count on pooled knowledge with which to make the decision. Third, democracies are long-lasting and more stable because their leaders are elected and answerable to voters. Fourth, democracy is considered to be the best government for economic growth and material well-being. Finally, democracy lets its citizens be free, which causes a state of mind allowing them to best develop their talents and skills. (Greenberg & Page, 2011, p.4).As stated, Democracy is ... ...ates Should Spread Democracy. Mar. 1998. Web. 1 Dec. 2011. .Greenberg, Edward S., and Benjamin I. Page. The Struggle for Democracy. 10th ed. Boston Longman, 2011. Print.Democracy and Human Rights. Current Issues. Ed. Joe Geraghty. 35th ed. Alexandria Close Up, 2011. 168-81. Print.Lagon, Mark P. Promoting Democracy The Whys and Hows for the United States and the external Community. Rep. Council on Foreign Relations, Feb. 2011. Web. 2 Dec. 2011. .Coyne, Christopher J., and Tamara Coffman Witte. Can We Export Democracy? Rep. CATO Institute, Jan.-Feb. 2008. Web. 2 Dec. 2011. .

Classifying Three NFL Teams According To Attitude :: essays research papers

Classifying Three NFL Teams According to AttitudeThe National Football coalition was formed decades ago by the merger of two national leagues. The Super Bowl is the traditional season-end activity that crowns the national champion. Each squad represented starts with genius of the original leagues.The number of teams active in the NFL does not remain the same for longr.o. the game of professional football is big business and suffer be passing profitable. When the NFL announces that it has approved new expansion teams, there is intense competition among team less cities to attract one of the franchises. The game is profitable for team owners and for players, just now it as well as is profitable for the cities in which teams are centered. It contributes to the local economy and enhances the stature of the city in where a team is located.Of course teams and their organizations are made up of individuals, but the teams themselves tend to settle into characteristics of their own. O nce established in reputation, the team flowerpot remain with it for years regardless of the changes that occur within and around it. Example stop be seen in any NFL team. The Tampa Bay Buccaneers are technically sound playing but very bad results. The team has been winning with much greater frequency in recent years, but it can expect to maintain the loser perception for years to come.As teams take on their its own personality. nearly of NFL teams relies rely on assessment of the number of games won compared to the number lost during a season or over a number of years. Teams also can be classified according to that personality, or at least according to the personality perceived by fans and the press. With the classification of good, average and bad. The Tennessee Titans will be utilise to show the good team the Minnesota Vikings will represent the average and the Dallas Cowboys will fill the role of bad.The Tennessee TitansThe Titans provide a good example of how teams can chan ge the perceptions that have built around them over the years. In the case of the Titans, the change was effected by moving to a new state, changing the team name, replacing personnel and replacing the coaching staff. The Titans hardly have the same team at all, but they formerly were the Houston Oilers. You should keep in mind that as the Oilers, the team had posted so many consecutive losing seasons that it had managed to destroy the reputation built during the winning years.

The Breakfast Club Essays -- Art

The Breakfast ClubAlmost 150 years ago, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr., expressed the pursuit sage but sad observation in his book The Professor at the Breakfast Table Society is always trying in whatever way or other to grind us down to a single flat surface. Unfortunately, this is still true today. Last week I saw the moving picture The Breakfast Club written and directed by John Hughes which expressed a similar theme. Fortunately, youth of every age are rather aware of what they are going through and have the ability to break the fast imposed on them by the socialization process which begins in the office and is reinforced at school, non only by students and parents but teachers like Mr. Vernon as well. In The Breakfast Club five disparate personalities, each reassure in his identity and yet filled with insecurities, spend a lazy Saturday confined to Detention at Shermer High School in Shermer, Illinois, for various and sundry(prenominal) school violations. Yet each character has a troubled life as foreshadowed by his very presence in Detention. Families mold, intentionally or not, their children into bittie reflections of themselves. School, thru peer pressure, thru the various academic and social clubs, and thru the imaginary audience, serves to enhance the socialization process begun at home. Students are labeled and are not allowed to c servee their worlds. Students hang out only with people who look, dress, and live like themselves.There are nerds, freaks, cholos, etc. Theres the Math Club, Prep Club, Latin Club, Physics Club for students who belong. Mr. Vernon, the teacher in scoot of the students, unwittingly assigns an essay with the subject who am I. Unwittingly because as Carl, the custodian and the eyes and ears of the institution, reveals that the students havent changed but that he, the teacher, has changed. Perhaps Mr. Vernon should answer the question himself. The movie then proceeds to answer the question through the actions and dialog ue of the protagonists. My favorite character (and yours too) is John Bender, the criminal, as portrayed by Judd Nelson, the leader of the notorious Hollywood Brat Pack. John is the main character in the movie and functions as the catalyst or the instigator. One by one, he shocks and exposes each students insecurities. John is spiritedness proof of the creed, If a child lives with hostility, He learns to ... ...e plate that reads EMC 2 for energy equals mass times the speed of light squared. And when he gets an F in Shop, his self-image cant include it. He takes a gun to school intending to shoot himself but gets caught. In the most important environment of a students life, even one F is not allowed. The school reinforces what the parents expect. Even his little sister echos the mothers sentiments when she admonishes him to find a way to study in Detention. It is from the Brains point of view that we realize that you (Mr. Vernon/the school) see us as you want to see us. We were b rainwashed, he writes in the collective essay. In the end the students, by revealing their fears and expressing their emotions, overcame the limits set by family and school, the ones that spit on them . They realized that they are immunized to authority and that they can change their worlds, that they have multi-faceted personalities. And so do Holmes, Hughes, and Bowie. Even a criminal can win the heart of a princess. John Bender was a better teacher than the system for he taught the Princess, the Jock, the Basketcase, and the Brain who they really were, and most importantly, who they were not.

Role of Female Characters in Fidelmans Epiphany in Naked Nude :: Naked Nude Bernard Malamud

Role of Female Characters in Fidelmans Epiphany in Naked Nude Word Count Includes Outline thesis In his picturesque short story, The Naked Nude, Bernard Malamud uses the female characters to develop, enact, and soundness Fidelmans epiphany and to bring about the protagonists final, artistic self-understanding. Bernard Malamud, a leading contemporary Jewish author, skirts in the midst of fantasy and reality in his almost allegorical short fiction, teaching the reader a lesson through coinciding elements of beauty and comedy. Venturing away from his usual, inner-city Jewish element, Malamud tackles cutting challenges of subject and setting in his novelistic collection of short stories, Pictures of Fidelman Malamud develops his protagonist through a series of six, interrelated short works, each of which may function tout ensemble independent from the others. In The Naked Nude, for instance, Fidelman comes to a new, artistic maturity through his attempt to copy the famous painting Venus of Urbino by Titian Tiziano. Malamuds recurring makeup of self-knowledge through suffering permeates this short work. Scarpio and Angelo, as primary antagonists, provide the bulk of this suffering for Fidelman. It is his own mental captivity concerning the female nude, however, that gives cause for Fidelmans eventual epiphany as an artist and as an individual. His relationship to the women in the work shapes his ability to capture the form of the Venus and to come to grips with his own self-worth. In The Naked Nude, Bernard Malamud uses the female characters to develop, enact, and resolve Fidelmans epiphany and to bring about the protagonists final, artistic self understanding. At the storys outset, Fidelman is forced to act as janitor and manservant to a group of ill mannered prostitutes under the employment of the padrone, Angelo. These wicked characters establish the first of a series of mental obstacles in the imprisoned protagonists attempt to copy Titians nude. They torment Fidelman with cynical laughter and exploit his demeaning position. His versed insecurity is established at the beginning of the story when he ponders his violent guillotine sketch, asking A mans head or his sex?...either case a terrible wound (Malamud 318). The limited omniscient narrator, revealing Fidelmans thoughts and feelings, likewise suggests that he could gain no inspiration from whores, and that maybe too many naked women close to made it impossible to draw a nude (Malamud 325). This illustrates Fidelmans early accreditation of his artistic impotency to desensitization. He soon recognizes, however, that the way in which he views the Venus also interrupts his progress.

Mark Twain :: essays research papers

Mark TwainThough popularity associated with the American frontier and life on the Mississippi, Samuel Longhorne Clemens --Mark Twain&8212actually spent many of his happiest and some productive long time in and near New York City. Mark Twain was, without question, the finest sastirist of his time. Through his writing, one can see as deeper morality than most of his time held. Twain wrote the Adventures of Huckleberry Finn in 1885. His novel of Huckleberry Finn was no exception he used his gift of satire to show the flaws of the people around him. He contrasted the illusion of freedom to realitity, ignorance with enlightenment, and what is percieved as peachy to what is truly good. Since its publication it has always seem to be in trouble. It is known as one of the greatest books ever written and also one of the most racials books ever written. Many people felt that it was similar to a history lesson of a hands on account of what life was equivalent in Mississippi. On the other han d people felt it is derogatory toward African-Americans. It is still frequently in the news, as various schools and school systems across the country either bar it from or restore it to their classrooms. The social classes that Twain portrays in this novel are extremely slanted, and they are not just about racism. It&8217s more like a rich-poor issue, which is illustrated by Huck and Jim (poor) versus the upper-class townspeople (rich). The upper-class people are racist and keep slaves. Huck, being part of the lower class, is not racist and makes friends with the slaves. Basically, Twain&8217s opinion is that they are wrong and separationalist. He continually portrays the upper-class people as immoral, unintelligent, and bigoted. On the other hand, the lower-class people, such as Huck and Jim, are portrayed as clever, moral, and self satisfied. Of course, Huck and Jim end up as heroes, successful in their quest for freedom. The illusion of freedom is a powerful one. It allows peopl e, in this case,Huck, to rest in a false sensew of control over one&8217s own life.

Mark Twain :: essays research papers

Mark straddleThough popularity associated with the American frontier and life on the Mississippi, Samuel Longhorne Clemens --Mark Twain&8212actually spent many of his happiest and most fecund years in and near New York City. Mark Twain was, without question, the finest sastirist of his time. Through his writing, angiotensin-converting enzyme can see as deeper morality than most of his time held. Twain wrote the Adventures of Huckleberry Finn in 1885. His novel of Huckleberry Finn was no exception he used his gift of satire to show the flaws of the people around him. He contrasted the illusion of exemption to realitity, ignorance with enlightenment, and what is percieved as good to what is truly good. Since its publication it has always seem to be in trouble. It is known as one of the greatest books ever written and also one of the most racists books ever written. Many people felt that it was similar to a history lesson of a hands on account of what life was like in Mississippi. On the other hand people felt it is derogatory toward African-Americans. It is still frequently in the news, as various schools and school systems across the country every ban it from or restore it to their classrooms. The social classes that Twain portrays in this novel are extremely slanted, and they are non just about racism. It&8217s more(prenominal) like a rich-poor issue, which is illustrated by Huck and Jim (poor) versus the upper-class townspeople (rich). The upper-class people are racist and keep slaves. Huck, being part of the lower class, is not racist and makes friends with the slaves. Basically, Twain&8217s opinion is that they are wrong and separationalist. He continually portrays the upper-class people as immoral, unintelligent, and bigoted. On the other hand, the lower-class people, much(prenominal) as Huck and Jim, are portrayed as clever, moral, and self satisfied. Of course, Huck and Jim end up as heroes, successful in their quest for freedom. The illusion of fre edom is a powerful one. It allows people, in this case,Huck, to rest in a false sensew of control over one&8217s own life.

Drama Evaluation

I think, although there were still a few mistakes, that my groups (made up of Liegha, Charlotte, Max, Robert, Katie, Claire and myself) performance went quite well. Rehersals at the beginning of this term were horrible, with group arguing and not listening to eachother, but after a few weeks we began to pick it up with better communicational skills and having different people in charge (director) really helped with decision making and getting everyone to listen to different ideas.MY personal rehersals worked really well, I managed to learn most of my lines within a few weeks, which gave me more time to practise my staging positions and interaction with the other characters on stage, although I dont feel this showed in my perfomance. My weakest scene would have been the Lancelot and Guineverre scene, where Max and I were lead characters. I think due to the fact that all eyes were on us, as we were very fill up together, gave me slight stage-frieght as my movement was quite stiff, unl ike in rehersals.I forgot most of the stage directions we, as a group, decided to use, to make the scene more slap-stick comemdy for the course of instruction 6s. Although I feel my vocal skills were my well-knitest skills for the scene I sounded more like a queen/princess then a normal teenager, I articulated so that audience members could understand me, and I think I projected my voice quite loudly. Our Booties scene came over quite effectively, with everyone looking realistly hypnotized.Katie, our Leader, came off really strong and wise and Claire, our McConnamal, came off really well in the fact that she was trying to trick poor Liegha, Someone, into handing over all her money. All the Booties remember their lines, on time, so we were close to in sync with eachover, which made the hypnotizism even more believeable. I think since the performance we have improved this scene, in the fact that weve got alot of energy for our new margin call Money, Money, Money which could engage the audience with them swaying and enjoying the music.All in all, I think that our performance went great, not perfect, but really, really well. As a group I feel we communicated well, assiduous the audience in a few scenes, and mangaged to make as few mistakes as posseible. As an indivual actor, I feel I can make alot of improvements to my serperate separate and to the whole group together, and to be honest it was alot of fun. CaraMay x

Emile Durkheim’s Theory of Crime and Crime Causation Essay

Abstr consummationThe concept of law-breaking has over the ages been subject to various definitions as the club tries to address it. Criminology is thereof the understand of crime and crime causation. It concerns itself with understanding the deep essence of crime as an act or omission, and in all the reasons behind its occurrence. In this pursuit, criminology draws on various new(prenominal) dramaticss such(prenominal) as sociology, biology, psychology, etc. This field of study is often argued to be a subdivision of sociology which the larger field since its main focus is grounded in brotherly realities. Hence, during the twentieth century, the sociological approach to crime was the most influential, thus scholars such Emile DURKHEIM bought about considerable impact to the common perception of crime.He was a French sociologist who, figureing the whole society as a reality, perceive crime as a mere element of the society a all told natural phenomenon and which serves certa in signifi hind endt functions. This work is therefore intended to, throughout a concise discussion, explicate and analyze the theory of crime and its causation as perceived by Emile Durkheim, mainly considering its natural and functional characteristics.Emile DURKHEIM (1858-1971) viewed inequality as a natural and inevitable human condition that is non associated with social maladies such as crime unless there is also a breakdown of social norms or rulesExplain and Assess Durkheims theory on crime and crime causation.IntroductionCriminology is understood to be the study of crime and crime causation as social phenomena it thus concerns itself with the study of the causes of crime and the treatment of the offenders.1 In this pursuit, criminology, as a subdivision of sociology2, draws on many fields inter alia psychology, biology, anthropology, etc. In the twentieth century, the sociological approach to criminology became the most influential approach this is fundamentally the study of social behavior, systems, and structures. 3 Emile DURKHEIM, a French sociologist, is amongst the scholars who exerted great influence on criminology during that period.He, unlike other scholars, both in and outside the field of sociology, perceived execrable behaviors as design part of all societies. No society, he argued, can ever have complete uniformity of moral consciousness4, and thus, there has eternally been some deviant characters from the comm merely accepted moral values. This write-up is therefore intended to briefly explicate and analyze the theory on crime and its causation as observed by E. Durkheim.Scholars in almost all the fields (related to criminology in particular) before and after Durkheim have endeavored to find the cause for crimes. In this regard, they have essay to find the causation of criminal behavior in different factors, including external factors such as in natural and supernatural forces,5 climate, economic conditions, density of population or certain ecological areas.6 In contrast to all the above factors, Durkheim maintained that the only explanation in relation to crime causation is to be found in essentially looking into the very nature of the society.7 In this respect, he was convinced that the individual is rather a product than an root of the society he is, otherwise, a small image of the world in which he lives, hence, the causation of his behaviors, be they criminal or not, could be found only by understanding the society in which he lives. For E. Durkheim, crime is therefore immanent in society and results from social interaction.Simply put, criminality proceeds from zip but the very nature of humanity itself and, far from being transcendent, it is immanent.8 In his writings, Durkheim emphasizes on the immanence of crime its causation as solely based upon the stuff world. Rejecting all definitions of crimes, as per the commonsense of any society, as acts that are harmful to society, Durkheim observes that all crimes, as a common characteristic, consist in acts universally disapproved of by members of each society they shock sentiments, which, for a given society, are found in all healthy consciences.9 Put only, a crime is a deviant behavior only because it goes against social norms. From this perspective, arguably, the French sociologist seems to In reference to the pre-classical school of criminology whereby crime causation was understood as based upon supernatural forces, i.e. forces beyond the natural or human capacities. Adopt the legal definition of crime, as any act that the law makes punishable.10 However, unlike the prop sensationnts of that legal definition, he hold the view that the said act punishable by the law serves a significant social function which is to support and reassure the same social norms orlaws of a society.From the above elements, one would deduce that according to this theory, a crime is, arguably, a paradoxical phenomenon. Durkheim, the theorist, suggests t hat a crime is normally caused by or results from social interactions, and it is not deviant per se unless so declared by the laws or social norms. This is arguably Durkheims eminence in the field of criminology which rests upon his broad approach to anti-social behavior.11 However, it lead be worth remembering that Durkheim, after identifying the essence of crime and causation, he went further to attribute to this phenomenon a certain function. This is what makes him different from all the scholars in the field of criminology. He observed that, not only is crime something normal in societies, it also plays some significant function.The Normality and Functionality of CrimeUnlike other social scientists before and after him, Durkheim maintains that criminality is Normal factor rather than a Pathological one.12 Especially in current societies, this might seem really strange. harmonise to Durkheim, crime is normal because a society the society cannot get rid of it it is utterly imposs ible for a society to exempt from criminality. He argues that it is a phenomenon, not due to any imperfection of human nature or society, but from thenormal course of affairs in that given society. Hence, it is the fundamental conditions of the social presidential term that logically imply it.Crime is hence all a part of the totality of a society. The criminal behavior is a behavior completely normal like any other and thus its complete eradication is quite impossible. Durkheim articulates A society exemptfrom it (crime) would necessitate a standardization of the moral concepts of all individuals which is neither possible nor desirable.14 From this contention, one would concur with Durkheim on the fact that a society cannot get ride with or completely eradicate criminality. The criminal justice system is well-set, not to completely eradicate criminality, but to try as much as they can to reduce its level.Furtherto a greater extent, Durkheim was of the view that crime serves a non-n egligible role within the society. The social function he attributes to crime is inextricably linked with the societys legal system, in that it supports or reassures the social norms of the society by the fact that it is considered as going against the said norms.15 angiotensin converting enzyme of the main justifications for his belief is that the fact that crime is found in all society simply suggests that it must be performing some necessary functions otherwise it would have degrading over the ages and by the end of the day, abolished in an advanced society.16 One of the most effective and necessary functions, he argued, crime plays is social change.17 Crime could be considered as one of the effective sources of change in a society. This could be exemplified by, in line with his definition of crime, the events that happened in the United States with the Anti-miscegenation Laws that promoted racial segregation.18 These laws began being violated as the American society progressed, it reached a point where, in violation those laws (social norms), many people started having inter-racial relationships. To some extent, the violation of those social norms, which could be regarded as crime, brought about social change in the US. Durkheim further argues that without crime, there could be no evolution in law.19 For instance, every individuals right to express himself should be guaranteed for any society to progress.Hence, the opportunity for a genius or an artist to carry out his work affords the criminal his originality at a lower level.20 Thus, there has to be a certain evolution of the laws in pitch to face such situation from time to time. He further drew some analogy to the trial of Socrates According to the Athenian Law, Socrates was a criminal, and his condemnation was more than just. However, his crime, namely, the independence of his thought, rendered a service both to his country and the humanity.21 In terms of evolution of the laws, this trial that occur red in the ancient ages is significant. From the above contentions, one would thus say, that crime should no longer be conceived as an evil that cannot be repressed. It should be considered, instead, as a normal phenomenon which can be faced for purposes of reduction its rate in the society.ConclusionCrime, according to Durkheim, is a normal phenomenon in the society that at the same time serves certain social functions. This paper emphasise on the fact that, unlike other scholars in the field of criminology, Durkheim perceived crime in, arguably, a kind of paradoxical manner in the sense that he started by defining crime as being caused by social interactions. For him, it is an act caused by social interaction, which (act) is not a crime per se, but it one becomes after being so declared by the social norms. He however recognized the negative part of crime, anyway, by conceding that crime is an act that shocks sentiments, which, for a given society, are found in all healthy consc iences.He finally suggests that, without condoning crime or presenting apology for it, crime must no longer be conceived as an evil that the society could be exempted from, but rather a reality that exists as part of the society to members of the society can react through punishment.22 Therefore, in stating that crime could be perceived as merely a normal and natural element, he conceived the whole society as reality which is meant to move and evolve.BIBLIOGRAPHYBlacks Law Dictionary (8th Ed. 2004).Wests Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. S.v. Criminology. Retrieved July 27 2014 from http//legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Criminology Durkheim, E. The Rules of Sociological Method, Edited by G. E. Gatlin, 1938. http//kpulawandsociety.wordpress.com/2012/10/18/durkheim-crime-serves-asocial-function/ Retrieved on July 27, 2014. Hamlin, J. The Normality of Crime. Durkheim and Erikson, Department of Sociology and Anthropology. UMD (2009).Walter A. Lunden Pioneers in Criminology XVIEmile Durkheim (1858-1917) Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. Vol. 49Issue 1, Article II (1958). Prins, A., Criminalite et Repression, Bruxelles, 1886.http//www.s-cool.co.uk/a-level/sociology/introduction-to-deviance/reviseit/deviance-durkheims-contribution. Retrieved on July 27, 2014.

Dominican vs Haiti

Haiti vs. the Dominican Republic Comparing Two Sister Countries They say the lowlife is always greener on the other side, for Haiti this saying seems to be true. Haiti and the Dominican Republic share the island of Hispaniola, further are completely different in many ways. Haiti is the poorest countries in the Hesperian hemisphere and almost all of its people live in p all overty, while the Dominican Republic is one of the wealthier countries.In 1960, both countries had the same per capita real gross domestic product but in the last 50 years, the Dominican Republic has more than tripled its growth compared to Haiti. While these two countries are similar in geography and historical institutions, the growth between the two is drastically different. Throughout this paper, I will compare both countries economic growth and why two countries with the same geographic area are so different. Up until the 1960s, the Dominican Republic and Haiti had very similar economic stance and were r elatively growing at the same pace.But suddenly, over the next decade, the Dominican Republic rapidly increased, while Haiti barely grew at all. One reason, according to Jared Diamonds book Collapse, is that because Haiti resides on the western side of the island and has a lower rainfall percentage resulting in deforestation and loss of dent fertility, which effects the agricultural industry and hinders their growth. Another factor is that Haiti has less(prenominal) than half the space that the Dominican Republic does, but in the 1960s Haiti had a larger universe of discourse.Throughout the 1960s, it seemed as Haiti was beating the Dominican Republic in population, but if you look at graph 1, you can see that as soon as the 1970s came about Haitis population growth slow carry out compared to the Dominican Republic. Because Haiti occupies a smaller portion of the island compared to the Dominican Republic, it has a higher population density in a smaller area, which also contributes to the poor soil fertility and deforestation, effecting Haitis agricultural industry.While Haitis agricultural industry was decreasing, the manufacturing industry increased because Haiti provided low-cost labor. This was a huge role in Haitis parsimony during the 1970s, as well as other services such as tourism. But tourism soon decreased due to political turmoil during the 1980s, and the media had identify Haiti has the place where the immune deficiency disease, commonly known as AIDS, had originated from. This caused Haiti to experience a rapid decrease in its economy, as you can see in the per capita real GDP in graph 2.You can identify the growth through the 1970s, and then during the 1980s you notice that it starts to decrease. This was just the beginning of Haitis downfall. On the other side of Hispaniola, the Dominican Republic was growing at a much faster pace. The Dominican Republic has the largest economy in the Caribbean and second largest of population and land mass. I t has a very stable manufacturing and construction industry. They also have mining, which exports many major minerals, like gold and silver.Tourism has also increased over the years, which has been the direct factory in the hoidenishs service industry. The Dominican Republics government fully supported the growth of the tourism industry, but when the countrys water supply became poor and there was a shortage of many supplies and materials they needed, the tourism industry decreased. While researching these two countries policies and economy standings, I came across information about both countries relationships to the United States.The United States and Dominican Republic have a very good relationship, and the US has strong interests in the Dominican Republics strong economy and stable democratic development. The two countries have a strong export and trading relationship, and work together on many conflicting affairs, such as trafficking illegal substances and immigration polic ies. This strong political and economical relationship, I believe, has greatly helped the rapid growth that the Dominican Republic has experience over the last half century.

A report on Arranged Marriages Essay

Arranged marriages be marriages that are arranged by someone other than the couplet themselves, usually by the parents or family. Arranged marriages are experienced all over the globe, some countries include Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Canada and India. These types of marriages baffle numerous positive and negative points.In a great part of Asia, marriages are still arranged by parents and family. Arrangements are frequently made simply on rational grounds. In countries much(prenominal) as different as Jordan and Cambodia, daughters are usually unify to distant family.Arranged Marriages are very controversial. Many people argue that choosing your life attendant is a fundamental right, and others seem to say that mommy and daddy know best. The truth is that arranged marriages are completely legal and practice sessiond in many cultures.In the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, everyone has fundamental freedoms. These freedoms are the basic rights that Canadians have. They sta te that everyone has fundamental freedoms freedom of conscience and religion of thought, belief, opinion, and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of intercourse freedom of peaceful assembly and freedom of association.The fact of the matter is, arranged marriages are a cultural thing, and the law is very hesitant to get involved. close commonly today, children can claim if they want to get an arranged marriage. If the child is lucky, the final vote will be theirs.The idea of arranged marriages is very thorny for our western countries to comprehend. In the western countries, the idea of marrying a stranger seems unnatural and odd. Most North Americans cant seem to recognize the idea of marrying an outsider. Although, this practice is generally the way things are done in Indian and Muslim countries, they will most likely continue to seem strange to North Americans.In Western countries, we lean on focusing our attention on more material issues such as sex, lov e, and beauty, which are the center of our relationships. People get married for such reasons, and then as a result, get bored of one another quite easily. In eastwardern countries, they tend to look for more practicality in their mates. They look for aspects such as integrity, diligence, ambition, humility and generosity.Arranged marriages can be successful, but either the man or woman may be displease with the spouse that has been chosen for him/her. whatsoevertimes, the man and woman get along, but at times there can be a lot of conflicting differences.In the case of any marriage, certain qualities are required in order to sustain a healthy relationship. Patience, love, understanding, trust and kindness are a hardly a(prenominal) of many helpful attributes that would help create a long lasting marriage. No matter what your reasons for marrying someone, you can make it a successful relationship by simply being courteous and respectful.In some cases, arranged marriages can impro ve the social standing of a family. In other cases, women get the come across to get employment, but women are usually stay-at-home mothers.There are certain rules that apply to arranged marriages. For one, you have to be the same nationality, so an East Indian would be pressured to marry one of his kind. In the Sikh culture and religion, the son or daughter have to marry the same caste, which means that the set out class would marry a low class person, and a high class would marry a high-class person.In India, if you try to get a divorce your way out of an arranged marriage, your parents will disown you. In Pakistan, 90 percent of marriages are arranged, compared to Japan, where only 25-30 percent of all marriages are arranged. Some Indian women have overdosed on drugs, in order to escape the harsh reality of their unwanted marriage.Statistics provide evidence that arranged marriages are no little happy, andeven more stable, than so-called love marriages. Through the ages, mothe rs have reassured their young daughters by the time they where married off that they dont have to worry love will come by itself. In some cases, people have grown to love for each one other, and other cases were not so fortunate.Marriage can be a big decision in ones life, whether you are getting married because of an arranged marriage or marrying for love. The basis on which marriage is created depends on an amount of factors, which include cultural, economic, and social aspects. Love, on the other hand, is the only factor needed for a love marriage. devil people might support their marriage on rushed, blinding love and find out that they arent in the least bit well matched. As Mamoon states, Love, marriage and compatibility are not the same Two people can be completely compatible yet have no love for each other and vice versa. Although, love might be a beautiful basis for marriage, it is not necessarily the best way to go when choosing whom you want to dwell with and how you wa nt to be provided for, for the rest of your life.My personal opinion on marriage in general is that its all relative. If you feel comfortable that you can choose a suitable spouse, which you will be with for a lifetime, then that should be your personal choice to make. However, if you feel that your parents could decide better than you could, then there is unimpeachably nothing wrong with getting an arranged marriage.The most important thing is that youre happy. Its not the route you take getting there, but the destination. If you are married your dream mate, then why does it matter how you found them?